In 1972, the federal National Capital Commission built a limited access parkway from the end of Ottawa's Bronson Avenue to the Ottawa International Airport. Designed for access to and from the airport, all other use by the people of Ottawa was meticulously blocked. Soon after, the city began to build its long-planned Eastern and Western Communities (east and west of Bank Street) between Hunt Club and Walkley. However, the Western Community ended up west of not just Bank Street, but west of the parkway as well. There was so little change to old plans that Cahill Drive still exists in both communities, as does a vestigial road allowance for their connection across Bank Street.
Given the long distance north to Walkley and south to Hunt Club Road, communication across the parkway between the two communities on foot rapidly developed. The parkway was unfenced, and there was a level crossing over the railway built by the Plante Dairy in 1926. However, crossing the 80 km/hr parkway was obviously a safety hazard and there were frequent close calls over the years for residents.
13 April 1994: the Hunt Club Secondary Plan and the Ottawa Official Plan include the
original connection between Cahill west and east, just stretched over the Airport Parkway
and the newly-fenced bus transitway (map below)
October 1998: The city gains control of the parkway south to Hunt Club Road and soon
opens north ramps to and from the Airport Parkway at Hunt Club; increased traffic on the parkway
between Heron and Hunt Club increases the danger to pedestrians crossing it. At the same time,
the pedestrian route under the parkway at Hunt Club Road becomes much more difficult due to the
crammed-in access ramps
6 January 2003: the community association passes a motion requesting a safe
pathway linking the Hunt Club Community with the new South Keys Shopping Mall over the Airport
Parkway
14 May 2003: the amalgamated Ottawa council approves an Official Plan that includes the
Secondary Plan's imaginary connection between Cahill east and west
20 September 2004: sod is turned for the first phase of the Sawmill Creek constructed
wetlands; it includes a bridge over the creek near the most widely used path connecting Cahill west
to the South Keys transit station
11 September 2006: the community association passes another motion requesting a
safe footpath
27 September 2007: the Sawmill Creek Constructed Wetland is officially opened; it
includes paved maintenance roads around the complex, but no route for safe public access to them
22 October 2007: Kenny Dagenais is killed crossing the parkway at Cahill Drive, his
mother establishes a roadside memorial for him and begins a relentless personal campaign for a
safe pedestrian crossing at the site of his death
8 January 2008: the community association prepares maps showing possible
routes for a real pathway
4 June 2008: a Statement of Work to study a pathway is approved by Transit Committee; it includes funding for
an environmental assessment, however the RFP is not issued until February 2009 and the EA
contract awarded to Genivar only in April. It later transpires that the original pre-EA schedule
for the project is not modified as a result of this delay despite warnings from Genivar
9 July 2008: Council approves a city-wide cycling plan that includes the imaginary
connection between Cahill west and east
31 March 2009: the community association presents a report
on the number of people who would have access to the Transitway with a safe pathway
23 June 2009: initial planning for the pathway is presented at a public meeting;
comments are requested and collected but there is no feedback to those who commented. The City
has no policy regarding public participation in city projects; no record is kept as to where the
comments went or whether they were considered during subsequent work
1 December 2009: updated plans for the pathway are presented at a public meeting; again
comments are requested and collected, again there is no feedback to those who commented nor any
evidence that they were considered by project planners
16 December 2009: the environmental assessment recommends the bridge proceed
6 January 2010: Transportation Committee approves the >environmental assessment
13 January 2010: Council approves the environmental assessment
13 April 2010: request for design proposals is issued; 4 are received, Genivar and
Delcan are shortlisted
25 August 2010: the design contract is awarded to Genivar
8 September 2010: the first meeting is held of a "Public Advisory group" to "oversee
pathway progress"; the membership is not released, nor is its mandate or reporting authority; a
second equally secret meeting is held two months later
7 December 2010: the detailed construction plans for the pathway are presented at a
public meeting; yet again comments are requested and collected, yet again there is no feedback to
those who commented nor any evidence that they were ever considered by project personnel
24 May 2011: the construction RFQ is issued; 5 bids are received. Despite concerns
by Genivar designers (personal verbal communication, later confirmed by
legal documents) that they could handle such a complex
project, L.W.Bray is selected
22 June 2011: the ceremonial first sod is turned
6 July 2011: construction work begins