Search this site:

 

Treatment of Noncitizens in H.R. 3200

Noncitizens and Provisions in H.R. 3200

Credits
In 2013, under §241 of H.R. 3200, certain individuals would be eligible for premium credits (i.e.,
subsidies based on income) toward their required purchase of health insurance. Even when
individuals have health insurance, they may be unable to afford the cost sharing (deductible and
copayments) required to obtain health care. Under H.R. 3200, those eligible for premium credits
would also be eligible for cost-sharing credits (i.e., subsidies). To be eligible for credits,
individuals must have family income of less than 400% of the federal poverty level (FPL), among
other requirements.28

To be eligible for the credits under §242 of H.R. 3200, individuals must be lawfully present in a
state in the United States, but generally not in the United States temporarily (i.e.,
nonimmigrants).29 Nonimmigrants—that is, foreign nationals who are admitted to the United
States for a specified period of time and a specific purpose—are “lawfully present,” but most,
with exceptions noted below, would be ineligible for the credits under H.R. 3200. The exceptions
for nonimmigrants who could obtain credits under H.R. 3200 would be trafficking victims, crime
victims, fiancées of U.S. citizens, and those who have had applications for legal permanent
residence (LPR) status pending for three years; these individuals are likely to become LPRs (i.e.,
immigrants) and remain in the United States permanently. Furthermore, §246 would bar
unauthorized aliens from receiving any premium or cost-sharing credit.30

Notably, many categories of nonimmigrants in the United States who have work authorization
(i.e., temporary workers) would meet the definition of a resident alien, and as a result would be
required under H.R. 3200 to have health insurance. Nonetheless, many of these aliens would be
ineligible for the credits under the bill. For example, professional specialty workers (H-1B) are
admitted to the United States for up to three years, and can stay for a maximum of six years.
Thus, in general, these aliens would be considered resident aliens under the I.R.C. and would be
required under H.R. 3200 to have health insurance, but would be ineligible for the credits under
the bill because they are nonimmigrants.31

In addition, the credits are based on an individual’s eligibility, but many tax returns are filed
jointly or with dependents. There could be instances where some family members would meet the
definition of an eligible individual for purposes of the credit, while other family members would
not. For example, in a family consisting of a U.S. citizen married to an unauthorized alien and a
U.S. citizen child, the U.S. citizen spouse and child could meet the criteria for being a crediteligible
individual, while the unauthorized alien spouse would not meet the criteria. H.R. 3200
does not expressly address how such a situation would be treated. Therefore, it appears that the
Health Choices Commissioner would be responsible for determining how the credits would be
administered in the case of mixed-status families. 32

Some have expressed concerns that since H.R. 3200 does not contain a mechanism to verify
immigration status, the prohibitions on certain noncitizens (e.g, nonimmigrants and unauthorized
aliens) receiving the credits may not be enforced. However, others note that under §142(a)(3) of
the bill, it is the responsibility of the Health Choices Commissioner (Commissioner) to administer
the “individual affordability credits under subtitle C of title II, including determination of
eligibility for such credits.” Thus, it appears, absent of a provision in the bill specifying the
verification procedure, that the Commissioner would be responsible for determining a mechanism
to verify the eligibility of noncitizens for the credits.33

Endnotes

26 For more on the Exchange, see CRS Report R40724, Private Health Insurance Provisions of H.R. 3200, by Hinda
Chaikind et al.

27 H.R. 3200 would not change any of the alien eligibility restrictions on the receipt of Medicaid. Thus, there could be
aliens who would meet the categorical and income eligibility requirements for Medicaid but are ineligible due to their
alien status (e.g., legal permanent residents within five years after entry to the United States), who under H.R. 3200
would be required to have health insurance.

28 The federal poverty level used for public program eligibility varies by family size and by whether the individual
resides in the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia versus Alaska and Hawaii. For a two-person family in
the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia, the federal poverty level (i.e., 100% of poverty) was $14,570.
See 74 Federal Register 4200, January 23, 2009, http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/09fedreg.pdf.

29 The actual provision reads: “an individual who is lawfully present in a State in the United States (other than as a
nonimmigrant described in a subparagraph (excluding subparagraphs (K), (T), (U), and (V)) of section 101(a)(15) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act).” (H.R. 3200, §242(a)(1))

30 In addition, in the subtitle of H.R. 3200 pertaining to premium credits, §246 states, “Nothing in this subtitle shall
allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United
States.”

31 For more information on the categories of nonimmigrants who are entitled to work in the United States, including
their approved length of stay in the country, see CRS Report RL33977, Immigration of Foreign Workers: Labor
Market Tests and Protections, by Ruth Ellen Wasem, and CRS Report RL31381, U.S. Immigration Policy on
Temporary Admissions, by Chad C. Haddal and Ruth Ellen Wasem.

32 The Commissioner’s responsibilities to administer the credits are outlined in §142(a)(3) of H.R. 3200.

33 For more information on existing systems and laws related to verification of immigration status, see CRS Report
R40144, State Medicaid and CHIP Coverage of Noncitizens, by Ruth Ellen Wasem.

Back to Contents