|
An Outline of
Rudolf Otto's
The Idea of the Holy
by Michael W. Clark, Ph.D.
Rudolf Otto's The Idea of the Holy: An
Inquiry into the non-rational factor in the idea of the divine and its relation
to the rational was first published by Oxford University Press in 1923. A
second edition appeared in 1950. This outline follows a 1973 reprint of the
second edition; it is both brief and, of course, selective. Moreover, I have not included the more specialized Appendixes (pp. 179-229).
Those interested are advised to read or at
least look over the entire
work to appreciate the fullness of Otto's
thought, the breadth of his scholarship and the influence of his travels in North
Africa, India, China and Japan. I also recommend a thematic summary by
John C. Durham.
The following quotations
(in red)* are deemed most important to each chapter with select paraphrasing in black text.
Critical comments appear [in square bracketed black text, followed by—MC].
Page
numbers (in red) refer to quotations, black
page numbers to chapters and paraphrases.

 |
 |
 |
 |
| Translator's
Preface to the Second Edition |
ix-xix |
| Translator John W. Harvey says the
following quote from Pascal's Pensees expresses Otto's own
attitude: "'If one subjects everything to reason
our religion will lose its mystery and its supernatural character.'" |
xviii |
| Forward by the Author to the First
English Edition (1923) |
|
| Otto says he wishes to study
the non-rational or supra-rational but does not wish to promote
"fantastic irrationalism." |
|
| Chapter I - The
Rational and the Non-Rational |
1-4 |
| "So far from
keeping the non-rational element in religion alive in the heart of the
religious experience, orthodox Christianity manifestly failed to
recognize its value, and by this failure gave to the idea of God a
one-sidedly intellectualistic and rationalistic interpretation."
[Otto was a Protestant. The Catholic tradition honors a rich variety of
mystical writings from numerous saints. I refer the reader to The Life
of St. Teresa of Avila by Herself among other titles which I
would provide
on request.
See also Otto's own comments in Chapter XII—MC]. |
3 |
| Chapter II - 'Numen' and the
'Numinous' |
5-7 |
| "Omen has given
us 'ominous', and there is no reason why from numen we should not
similarly form a word 'numinous.'"
[Numen
is a Latin word usually translated as the power, nod or presence of a
deity—MC]. |
7 |
| Chapter III - The Elements in the
'Numinous' |
8-11 |
| The experience of the
numinous requires one to feel creaturely and dependent on some
kind of supreme, overpowering might.
"The numinous is thus felt
as objective and outside the self." |
10-11 |
| Chapter IV - Mysterium Tremendum |
12-24 |
| 'Numinous dread' or awe characterizes
the so-called 'religion of primitive man', where it appears as 'daemonic
dread.' "This crudely naive and primordial
emotional disturbance, and the fantastic images to which it gives rise,
are later overbourne and ousted by more highly developed forms of the
numinous emotion, with all its mysteriously impelling power." |
15-16 |
| Chapter V - The Analysis of 'Mysterium' |
25-30 |
| "Mysticism continues
to its extreme point this contrasting of the numinous object (the numen),
as the 'wholly other', with ordinary experience." |
29 |
| Chapter VI - The Element of
Fascination |
31-40 |
| Lower levels of the numinous are
evident in such works as the poetry of Sophocles.
"It may mean evil or imposing, potent and strange, queer and marvelous,
horrifying and fascinating, divine and daemonic, and a source of
'energy.'" |
39 |
| Chapter VII - Analogies and
Associated Feelings |
41-49 |
| Music feeling is something like
numinous feeling in that "we attribute to it a
spell, an enchantment." But this is only an analogy.
"We must beware of confounding in any way the
non-rational of music and the non-rational of the numinous itself, as
Schopenhauer, for example, does." |
49 |
| Chapter VIII - The Holy
as a Category of Value |
50-59 |
| We have both the
light thrill of awe before the tremendum of the numen and also,
and more especially, the feeling of this unique disvalue or unworth of
the profane confronted by the numen...Here, then, comes in the felt
necessity and longing for 'atonement.' One begins to crave the
close presence of the numen so as to transcend one's sense of
unworthiness as "'creature' and profane natural
being." When we feel "guilty of a
bad action...the evil of the action weighs upon us and deprives
us of our self-respect." And the negative effects continue into a
second stage. "The same perverse action that
before weighed upon us now pollutes us...The man feels a need, to
express which he has recourse to images of washing and
cleansing."
Christianity expresses the mysterious need for atonement or expiation
more fully and effectively than any other religion.
And in this too, it
shows its superiority over others. It is a more perfect religion and
more perfectly religion than they, in so far as what is potential in
religion in general becomes in Christianity pure actuality...[teachers
will have to demonstrate how]
the Christian religious experience, how the 'very numen', by imparting
itself to the worshipper, becomes itself the means of 'atonement.'" |
54-55, 56 |
| Chapter IX - Means of Expression of
the Numinous |
60-71 |
| "The magical is
nothing but a suppressed and dimmed form of the numinous, a crude form
of it which great art purifies and ennobles." Otto says the
Chinese landscape and religious painting of the classical T'ang and Sung
dynasties confronts us with the numinous. He adds that the use of
empty space - the void or emptiness - is a negation that allows the
wholly other to become actual. [We cannot know for certain if this type
of numinosity is qualitatively equivalent to others. To compound the
problem, various individuals may experience this type of numinosity
differently, not only in intensity but in character.—MC] |
67,
69-70 |
| Chapter X - The Numinous in the Old
Testament |
72-81 |
| The numinous is found in all
religions but is preeminent in the Bible. "The
capital instance of the intimate mutual interpenetration of the numinous
with the rational and moral is Isaiah." |
72
75 |
| Chapter XI - The Numinous in the
New Testament |
82-93 |
| Otto notes the power, majesty and
goodness of God but also the presence of "weird
awe and shuddering dread before the mysteries of the transcendent."
He then cites Matthew 10:28, "'But fear him
which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.'"
[Some translations of this passage use the word "him" and others "God"—MC].
Otto says that the idea of election (i.e. chosen by God for salvation in
everlasting heaven) entails the experience of grace. [As with the term
numinosity, we cannot know just what the so-called "experience of grace"
means for different individuals. Even within ourselves, at one stage in
life we may associate a certain experience with grace (e.g. an endorphin
rush after jogging) and yet later in life come to experience something
even more sublime, which we then designate as "grace," reformulating the
former endorphin experience as something qualitatively different. It
seems the healthy (and scientific) position would be to stay open to new
experiences (and thus personal updates) with regard to the idea of grace,
all the while realizing that we can probably never know with
certainty what another person experiences nor means when using
terms like grace and numinosity. This issue arguably throws into doubt
Otto's claims pertaining to comparative mysticism, the superiority of
Christianity, etc. Assuming, of course, that God didn't reveal knowledge
to him directly or indirectly, which is also possible. Even if Otto's
claims are correct, the argumentation would appear weak to hardcore
rationalists, especially those biased against the idea of revealed
knowledge. More creative and arguably advanced thinkers, however, would
at least entertain the possibility of revealed knowledge rather than
automatically dismissing it.—MC] |
84
87
|
| Chapter XII - The Numinous in Luther |
94-108 |
| Otto says that in
"less authentic forms assumed by legend and
miracle," in its Neo-Platonic influenced concepts, and in the
"paradoxes and mysteries of Catholic dogma"
there is an "intimate rapport of Catholic piety
with mysticism." He suggests that the Lutheran school has "not done justice"
to the numinous aspect of God as understood by Luther
himself and Christianity in general. [This chapter highlights Otto's
independent thinking. Along these lines Otto originally aspired to be a
minister but a very conservative German Lutheran Church
hesitated to
give him an appointment.—MC]. Otto also says that
"the mysterious is much less in evidence in the
official systems of doctrine, whether Catholic or Protestant."
[This may seem confusing in light of the above quotation but in
Catholicism
all dogmas are doctrines but not all doctrines are dogmas—MC] . |
94,100, 104,108 |
| Chapter XIII - The Two Processes of
Development |
109-111 |
| Otto speaks of a two-step process
involving the initial numinous consciousness followed by the
rationalization and moralization of that experience. But Otto's view is
not a kind of postmodern, open-ended polymorphism. He posits an overall
spiritual and moral development in this process.
"And this process of rationalization and moralization of the numinous,
as it grows ever more clear and more potent, is in fact the most
essential part of what we call 'the History of Salvation' and prize as
the ever-growing self-revelation of the divine." Otto stresses
that this does not entail a suppression or supersession of the numinous,
"but rather the completion and charging of it with
a new content." [Today we would probably speak more in terms of
how we 'conceptualize' an initial experience. Along these lines I often
stress the role of interpretation, especially with regard to
unusual experiences which supposedly prove the belief in reincarnation
beyond a shadow of a doubt.—MC] |
109-111 |
| Chapter XIV - The Holy as an A Priori
Category, Part I |
112-116 |
| Otto likens the numinous to Kant's use
of the term a priori. For Otto the numinous
"issues from at the deepest foundation of cognitive apprehension that
the soul possesses." This means that the numinous
"comes into being in and amid the sensory data and
empirical material of the natural world and cannot anticipate or
dispense with those, yet is does not arise out of them, but only
by their means." [Kant also makes a debatable distinction between
(a) essentially unknowable noumena and (b) the world of
phenomena. See discussion at http://earthpages.wordpress.com/contact/#comment-10037—MC] |
113 |
| Chapter XV - Its Earliest Manifestations |
117-131 |
| Otto discusses numinosity in
'pre-religion' in the following order: (1) Magic (2) Worship of the
dead (3) The idea of power in objects, such as mana (Pacific
Islands) and orenda (North America) (4) The idea of 'souls' and 'spirits' (5) Natural phenomena
believed to be alive or animate (6) Fairy stories and myth
(7) The rise of the daemon. With regard to (7) Otto says
"to each numen is assigned a seer and there is
none
without one." (8) The notions of 'clean' and 'unclean', 'pure'
and 'impure' "already found in a purely natural
sense, prior to their religious application." (9) Otto discusses
the relation between the numen and the natural. (10) He then says that
the type found in (7) "the feeling of daemons,"
is the purest form because the "'religious'
emotion" isn't being projected onto an earthly object but is
experienced within the self. [Otto's use of the term "diverted" seems
highly similar to fundamental instances of Freudian and Jungian
projection—MC]. Otto then says that the natural psychologists of his
day ignored the importance of the
"self-attestation of religious ideas in one's own mind." Otto
says theories which attribute the numinous to
"historical traditions and dim memories of a 'primeval revelation'"
are as remiss as the natural psychologists because they too
ignore the importance of "self-attestation from
within." |
117-131,
122, 125, 130, 131 |
| Chapter XVI - The 'Cruder' Phases |
132-135 |
| "The more
developed forms of religious experience...and the 'crude', and
rudimentary emotions of 'daemonic dread'" are both a priori.
Wild fanaticism is a crudity or primitive 'religion.'
"Here the numinous appears as religious mania,
possession by the numen, intoxication, and frenzy." [Some of the
so-called more developed religions still valorize this idea, as with the
stories and legends of Catholic saints euphorically running about
convents and doing seemingly 'crazy' things (e.g.
St. Francis of Assisi
standing naked in public) declaring the glory of Christ. Otto perhaps addresses this issue in the next chapter.—MC]. Otto says
"to know and to understand conceptually
are two different things." |
132, 135 |
| Chapter XVII - The Holy as an A Priori Category, Part II |
136-142 |
| "By the continual living activity of its non-rational elements a religion is guarded from passing into 'rationalism.' By being steeped in and saturated with rational elements it is guarded from sinking into fanaticism or mere mysticality, or at least from persisting in these, and is qualified to become a religion for all civilized humanity." Otto says the degree to which a religion unites the irrational and the rational in a healthy, harmonious way is a measure by which to rank religions. [This loosely parallels Einstein's views about religion and science and might have implications for discussions about religions and cults.—MC] |
141-142 |
| Chapter XVIII - The Manifestations of the 'Holy' and the faculty of 'Divination' |
143-154 |
| Otto talks about several forms of
'signs,' divination and inner impulses. "Beside
the inner revelation from the Spirit there is an outward revelation of
the divine nature." [This is something akin to the assumptions
underlying Jung's idea of
synchronicity—MC] Otto says the divination of Goethe,
the 'pagan', as he sometimes referred to himself, may be accurate but
doesn't involve the numinous as it would with a prophet. [A critic might
ask how Otto is qualified to say what Goethe himself experienced. I
discuss this issue in IX and XI, above—MC] Acts of
divination that
merely entail the daemonic experience of the numinous "not at
the level of the divine and the holy may in a highly cultivated mind
only stir emotional reactions of bewilderment and bedazzlement, without
giving real light or warmth to the soul." Goethe is being
informed by an "a priori principle that is not
explicit and overt, but dim and obscure." [This calls to mind C.
G. Jung's archetypes, particularly those pertaining to the
shadow. Jung's archetypes exist as underlying, unknowable
substances and in the genetic structures contained in the
body—MC] |
143, 153, 154 |
| Chapter XIX - Divination in Primitive
Christianity |
155-161 |
| Speaking of Jesus, Otto points
out that "His own relatives take
Him for a man 'possessed', an involuntary acknowledgement of the
'numinous' impression He made upon them." |
159 |
| Chapter XX - Divination in Christianity
To-day |
162-174 |
| "Whoever can thus
immerse himself in contemplation
[of Jesus without sin, suffering for others]...will
find the 'intuition of the eternal in the temporal."
The suffering of Jesus and the resultant
Cross, which symbolizes the eternal mystery, is the completion of Job. |
169,
173 |
| Chapter XXI - History and the A Priori in
Religion: Summary and Conclusion |
175-178 |
| Jesus is the highest stage of the
'Spirit' where person and performance is "most
completely the object of divination [and]...holiness."
Next is the prophet, who has "the power to
hear the 'voice within' and the power of divination." |
178 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
*Please reference
above quotations as follows: Otto, Rudolf. The Idea of the Holy cited in
Michael W. Clark, "An Outline of Rudolf Otto's The
Idea of the Holy."
www.earthpages.org. 2008.
Add your
Comment 
An Outline of
Rudolf Otto's The Idea of the Holy
© Michael W. Clark 2008. All rights reserved.
|