Kuyper's Cultural Mandate  Antimetabole and chiasmus

Kuyper's two kingdoms or cities are two Antithetical categories of a single identity.  It matters
very much how he interprets Saint Augustine's Two Cities.  What is mystical is Kuyper's Radical
Romantic Palingenesis
Hermetic would probably be a better term than Gnostic in Kuyper's case,
since Hermeticism tends to be more world-affirming.  However, as a Reformational Christian,
Kuyper is Radically Antithetical to both Hermeticism and Gnosticism and his Romanticism can be
eclectic without becoming accommodational or synthetic.  Because of his Sphere Sovereignty, he
is multi-aspectual and theosophical, not rational-reductive.  Theosophical order is to rational order
as Multi-aspectual Cosmonomic order is to logical order, and because of his self-reflectiveness,
Kuyper is mystically antimetabolic or chiasmic in an Eastern Orthodox sense, both cosmically and
cosmologically.  He is a Calvinist who makes the sign of the cross at every point of his existence
in a Cappadocian way which inverts but includes the Occidental way.  It matters very much how he
interprets Saint Augustine's Two Cities.  His Christian theosophy is multi-aspectually encyclopedic,
cross-rational referential,
and photographically memorial, therefore Patristic.  "Fecerunt itaque
ciuitates duas amores duo, terrenam scilicet amor sui usque ad contemptum Dei, caelestem uero
amor Dei usque ad contemptum sui.
"Likewise, two cities have been formed by two loves, the
worldly by the love of self, even to the contempt of God, the heavenly by the love of God, even to
the contempt of self." Augustine, City of God, XIV.28 (AcBdAdBc) (parallelism with love & contempt,
chiasmus with self and God)." (cf. C. Van Til on Paradox)  Kuyper's dialectic is antimetabolic and
apophatic (in the Eastern Orthodox sense of the positivity of negativity), and he is not Hegelian (unless
we need to reread Hegel) and overcomes the Absolute Religious Antithesis and the dialectical religious
ground-motives.

Through the flesh (Hebrew 10:19-25).

A. Kuyper, De 'kleyne luyden'
<http://openlibrary.org/works/OL15575798W/De_%27kleyne_luyden%27>
<http://www.allofliferedeemed.co.uk/kuypertimeline.htm>

Steve Bishop, Recent (re)readings on Kuyper 2 (an acidental blog, Saturday, 1 October 2011)
<http://stevebishop.blogspot.com/2011/10/recent-rereadings-on-kuyper-2.html>
J. de Bruijn (1999), 'Abraham Kuyper as a romantic', in C. van der Kooi and J. de Bruijn (eds) Kuyper Reconsidered:Aspects of his Life and Work, VU Studies on Protestant History Amsterdam VU Press, ch.3.

This paper looks at two other Dutch men, Multatuli and Van Eeden, and compares Kuyper to them. He maintains that Kuyper was a romantic. However, he doesn't fully define what he means by Kuyper as a romantic. For de Bruijn being a romantic seems to imply an inner conflict, a melancholia and hypocondia as well as a poetic streak.

Gerard van Moorsel:
"So radical was Kuyper's view of Christian conversion in all areas of life, that it is
really impossible to follow him meaningfully without coming into a direct contact with
the “principalities and powers.” Reformed pastor and scholar, Gerard van Moorsel,
has observed, We do not even dream of calling this too much abused neo-Calvinistic
divine, philosopher, journalist and statesman (18371920) a gnostic or semi-gnostic, but
this does not alter the fact that, here, the τιμωρίαι-δυνάμεις[timoriai-dunameis]-scheme
is palpably present or rather: has to be present as a result of a prima regeneratio carried
à outrance" (Gerard van Moorsel: The Mysteries of Hermes Trismegistus  A Phenomenologic
Study in the Process of Spiritualisation in the Corpus Hermeticum and Latin Asclepius,
(Utrecht: Drukkerij en Zoon, 1955), pp.112-113 n50).

Theodore Plantinga, The Reformational Movement:
Technology and Verzuiling
  (Myodicy, Issue 26, June 2006)

Yet only a handful of pages later, Kuyper seems to qualify his thesis somewhat:

If palingenesis [TP: regeneration] operated immediately from the centrum of our inner life to the outermost circumference of our being and consciousness, the antithesis between the science which lives by it and that which denies it, would be at once absolute in every subject. But such is not the case. [NOTE kuyper33]

Van Ruler sees a trace of Gnosticism here. [NOTE vanruler44] S.U. Zuidema (1906-75), who devotes 54 pages to untangling Kuyper's complex thoughts concerning common grace, also admits to a "gnostic remnant" in Kuyper. Zuidema's essay offers a robust defense against Van Ruler's criticism of Kuyper, and so Zuidema insists that the Gnostic tendency does not get the upper hand.


Dr. J. Glenn Friesen, Herman Dooyeweerd: De Wijsbegeerte der Wetsidee
<http://www.members.shaw.ca/jgfriesen/Notes/Bibliography.html>

"Comparative Study of Kuyperian Palingenesis: the Transcendent and Human Ego in Japanese Thought," in Kuyper Reconsidered: Aspects of His Life and Work, ed. Cornelis van der Kooi and Jan de Bruijn (Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij, 1999).


Chiasmus: The Crisscross Figure of Speech
<http://grammar.about.com/od/rhetoricstyle/a/Chiasmus-The-Crisscross-Figure-Of-Speech.htm>

Chiasmus
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiasmus>

Chi as a figure of Christ

In Christian poetry, chiasmus takes on added meaning since Chi is the first element of Chi Rho, the first letters of "Christ" in Greek, and since the "X" that characterizes chiasmus stands for the cross on which Christ was crucified. Thus, Christian poets have utilized chiasmus in very specific places to direct attention to an added layer of meaning. A good example is found early on in John Milton's Paradise Lost, in a passage where the Son of God tells his father that untempered justice without mercy is an unlikely course of action in his predicted punishment for Man's fall: "That be from thee farr, / That farr be from thee" (Bk.3, 153-54).[3]

A B B A
be from thee farr farr be from thee

The Son of God's future role as Christ is prefigured as it were by the utilization of the cruciform chiasmus (be—far/far—be); Christ's crucifixion will be the beginning of God's mercy tempering his justice. Earlier in the same passage chiasmus was already used in the description of the Son of God's appearance: "In his face / Divine compassion visibly appeerd, / Love without end, and without measure Grace" (140-42).[3][4]

A B B A
Love without end without measure Grace

[edit] As a synonym for antimetabole

These examples are often quoted by modern commentators to demonstrate chiasmus, although they are defined as antimetabole in the classical sense.


Antimetabole
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimetabole>

October, 2011

mmm

January 10, 2012

Patrick Lee Miller, Becoming God  Pure Reason in Early Greek Philosophy
<http://www.continuumbooks.com/books/detail.aspx?BookId=131971&SearchType=Basic>
"Becoming god was an ideal of many ancient Greek philosophers, as was the life of reason, which they equated with divinity. This book argues that their rival accounts of this equation depended on their divergent attitudes toward time. Affirming it, Heraclitus developed a paradoxical style of reasoning—chiasmus—that was the activity of his becoming god. Denying it as contradictory, Parmenides sought to purify thinking of all contradiction, offering eternity to those who would follow him. Plato did, fusing this pure style of reasoning—consistency—with a Pythagorean program of purification and divinization that would then influence philosophers from Aristotle to Kant. Those interested in Greek philosophical and religious thought will find fresh interpretations of its early figures, as well as a lucid presentation of the first and most influential attempts to link together divinity, rationality, and selfhood."

Heraclitus  Parmenides  Relativization of the law of non-contradiction
Patrick Lee Miller, Crosswise logic
<http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2010/12/13/crosswise-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-73113>

Flaw of the Excluded Middle
<http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/14692.htm>

Heraclitus the Riddler
The Father of the Doctrine of Flux and the Unity of Opposites
<http://www.archimedes-lab.org/heraclitus_aphorism.html>

The 'Parmenidean Life' is about Connecting Dots
<http://shandresen.typepad.com/touchy_subjects/2007/11/the-parmenidean.html>

Ludwig von Bertalanffy
<http://www.isss.org/lumLVB.htm>

Daniël F. M. Strauss, The scope and limitations of Von Bertalanffy's systems theory
<http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=14517869>

Daniël F.M. Strauss, How “rational” is “rationality”?
<http://www.freewebs.com/dfmstrauss/How%20Rational%20is%20Rationality.pdf>


January 22, 2012

BIBLE AS LITERATURE
Chiasmus in the New Testament
These X-Files are seminal studies regarding chiasmus
http://www.inthebeginning.org/chiasmus/xfiles.htm
Introduction
http://www.inthebeginning.org/chiasmus/introduction/chiasmus_intro.htm

  • Index